Skip to main content
CasePilot
YOUR CO-PILOT FOR THE CASE YOU’RE LIVING THROUGH · OREGON BETA

Your case, finally in one place you can ask questions of.

Going through your own evidence is some of the hardest work a legal matter asks of you. It’s also work no one else can do for you. CasePilot is an agentic AI built for that work, the preparation phase, when you’re the only person who knows your case from the inside, and the cost of being inside it is starting to add up.

It reads everything you’ve collected and holds it in one place. You ask questions in plain English. You get back answers grounded in your own documents, with the verbatim quote and page number for every claim. You hand your attorney work that’s ready for review, not work that needs rebuilding from scratch.

See how it works View live demo
Evidence stays on your account. Every answer grounded in your documents. Built by someone who lived it.
THE WORK THAT’S YOURS TO DO

You are the only person who knows your case from the inside.

Your attorney can argue it. They can never live it. Hiring someone to read your evidence is too expensive and too intimate, since these are your texts, your finances, the worst chapter of your life. You can’t outsource the work, and you can’t ignore it. The evidence is yours. The work is yours.

What makes it heavy is not the volume, although the volume is real. What makes it heavy is what the work asks of you. Going back through your own life, in detail, to find the moments that matter for a hearing two weeks away. Reading the same difficult exchanges again, looking for one date or one number. Sitting with the parts of your story you’d otherwise be trying to move past, because the case requires you to remember them precisely.

It accumulates. The hours add up, but more than that, the emotional cost adds up. It clouds your thinking. It costs you sleep and focus on the parts of your life that aren’t the case. By the time you sit down with your attorney, you’ve already done a kind of work no one trained you for, in a register no one prepared you for.

The logistical part is real too. Years of email and messages, scattered across accounts and apps. Tax returns and financial records you weren’t trained to read. Hundreds of pages with the answers you need somewhere inside them. You know the truth is in there. Reaching it has been the problem.

This is the work CasePilot was built for.

WHAT YOU CAN ASK IT

You ask. It investigates. The answer is grounded in your documents.

This finding came from a question asked in plain English: “Does the income reported in his June 2024 declaration match what his W-2 actually shows?” CasePilot read 124 pages of declaration plus 47 pages of financial records to answer it. The verbatim quotes and page numbers are the answer, exactly as the system returned them.

View live demo
WHY OTHER AI TOOLS HAVEN’T WORKED FOR THIS

Most people in your situation try AI.

Specifically, the kind of AI everyone has now: a chat box. You paste a paragraph from a declaration, ask what to make of it, and get back an answer that sounds reasonable.

It hasn’t worked, and there are reasons it hasn’t worked.

A chat box was designed for one conversation at a time, not for a case. It can hold a few documents in its working memory before it starts forgetting what it read. It can’t open your Gmail, parse your WhatsApp export, or read the 142 PDFs in your discovery production. When you ask it to do math on a tax return, it gets the math wrong in plausible-sounding ways. When you ask it whether your evidence supports a particular claim, it tends to produce support whether or not the support is actually there. It invents citations to documents that don’t exist. It loses the middle of long inputs. Every paragraph you paste arrives as a fresh conversation, with no memory of what you showed it the day before.

These aren’t bugs that get fixed in the next model release. They’re properties of the architecture itself.

Software engineers solved a version of this problem two years ago, in their own world. They stopped chatting with AI and started giving it agency. An agentic system plans a task before it starts, retrieves information from structured sources, performs calculations in deterministic code, verifies its own work against original material, and refuses to ship output it can’t justify. That paradigm is what makes AI useful for navigating a codebase of thousands of files. It’s also the paradigm that makes AI useful for navigating your case.

CasePilot is the first agentic AI built specifically for legal evidence.

It’s organized around a discipline that solo agentic systems still get wrong. The language model plans and writes. It doesn’t retrieve, calculate, or validate its own output. Code does that work, in five stages, with each stage’s output checked before the next one runs.

That’s the part that makes it reliable.

See the framework
A NOTE FROM THE FOUNDER
Assaf Mevorach, Founder of CasePilot

Assaf Mevorach · Founder · Portland, OR

I’m Assaf. I’ve been a software engineer for twenty-five years and I’ve followed AI closely as an enthusiast, building with the tools as they’ve matured and paying attention to where the field has been going.

A year ago, I found myself in my own family-law case in Oregon.

I knew before I started that chat AI wasn’t going to help me with the substance. The actual problem wasn’t writing letters; the actual problem was reach. I had years of evidence buried across hundreds of files, in formats that didn’t talk to each other, and I knew the answers I needed were in there. I just couldn’t get to them.

So as I was working on my own case, I started building the system that would let me reach in. Not as a separate project. As part of the work itself. Each thing I needed to know, the W-2 reconciliations, the message timeline, the contradictions across years of declarations, I built the part of the system that could answer it.

By the end of the case, the system was finding things I’d missed. It was doing in an afternoon what would have taken me a weekend by hand, and it was doing all of it the way an engineer wants software to behave: traceable, grounded, and willing to refuse when the evidence wasn’t there.

Now I’m bringing it to everyone walking the same road.

— Assaf, founder · Read the full story

THE FRAMEWORK

How CasePilot works, and why you can rely on it.

CasePilot is built around a five-stage reasoning framework. The pattern is a familiar one in software: keep the language model in the lane it’s good at, which is planning, synthesizing, and writing, and use deterministic code for the things it’s bad at, which are retrieving, calculating, and verifying its own output. Each stage has a single job. Each is enforced by code, not by promises.

You can read the stages below if you want the detail. You can also skip them. The product behaves the same either way.

01 /

Read everything

Ingest and structure

Every page of every document parsed and indexed. Tables extracted separately. Embedded with legal-domain vectors and a keyword index, so retrieval works on both meaning and exact match.

02 /

Select a retrieval plan

Strategy

Before any retrieval runs, the system selects a category-specific retrieval strategy from a library of plans calibrated for legal evidence work. Each plan specifies the queries to issue, the sources to prefer, and the rules for ranking results. The plan is the contract for the rest of the run.

03 /

Quote, don’t paraphrase

Gather evidence

The model never reads raw PDFs. It reads passages already retrieved from your indexed documents, with the source location attached to each one. Numerical values come from a deterministic database query, not from the model’s reading. The model writes; it doesn’t compute.

04 /

Mark the gaps

Reconcile evidence

Every retrieved fact is classified. Corroborated by another source, contradicted, single-sourced, or missing. Gaps are marked [GAP] explicitly. The system never fills in what it didn’t find.

05 /

Verify before shipping

Synthesize and validate

Drafts are generated only from the reconciled evidence. A deterministic Python validator checks every quote in every draft against the source bytes. If a quote doesn’t match, the run fails. Nothing ships unless the validator passes.

See the full framework
WHAT IT DOES
01

Holds your case in one place.

Every email, every message, every court filing, every financial record, every scanned letter. Uploaded once, indexed deeply, searchable instantly. The years of scattered evidence become one navigable archive.

02

Answers the questions you’ve been carrying.

Ask in plain English. “What did he report as income in 2023?” “Are there messages that contradict the declaration?” “When did the school pickups stop?” Every answer comes back grounded in your documents, with the verbatim quote and page number you can verify yourself.

03

Surfaces what you couldn’t see alone.

Cross-references every document against every other one. Flags timelines that don’t add up. Surfaces financial figures that conflict across filings. Catches statements that contradict the same person’s earlier sworn declarations. Work that would take a careful reader a month, done in minutes.

04

Drafts what your attorney can refine.

Declaration drafts, demand letters, motion responses, with every paragraph backed by source quotes, page numbers, and exhibit numbers. Every export marked [DRAFT — ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED]. You hand your attorney work that’s ready for review, not work that needs to be built from scratch.

Sources

One place for all your evidence.

The evidence in your case lives in at least six different places. CasePilot reads all of them. Every quote can be traced back to the page, the line, and the moment it came from.

MAIL

Gmail

Every email, threaded and dated.

MESSAGING

WhatsApp

Chat exports parsed and timestamped.

FILINGS

Court documents

PDFs, declarations, motions.

FINANCIAL

Financial records

W-2s, tax returns, bank statements.

DOCUMENTS

Word, Excel, CSV

Drafts, exhibits, ledgers.

MESSAGING

iMessage exports

Mac chat.db parsed locally.

IMAGES

Scans & photos

OCR with offset preservation.

EXPORTS

OFW & email files

OFW, EML, MBOX.

The process

How it works.

01

Upload your evidence

Drop everything: PDFs, emails, financial records, WhatsApp exports, court filings, scanned letters. CasePilot fingerprints, parses, and indexes every page, preserving offsets so every citation is traceable.

142 documents · 1,847 pages indexed in 8 minutes
02

Search and investigate

Ask the questions you’ve been carrying for months. “What did he report as income in 2023? Are there messages that contradict the declaration? When did the pattern of late pickups start?” The system investigates across every document you’ve uploaded and answers in plain language, with the source quote and page number attached to every fact.

Hybrid retrieval · BM25 + voyage-law-2 · merged via reciprocal rank fusion
03

Export a citation-backed draft

Every finding becomes a paragraph in a declaration, letter, or memo, with the verbatim quote, page number, and source document attached. Marked draft. Ready for attorney review or self-filing.

Citation validator runs on every output · Every export marked draft
Detection

The contradictions are already in your documents.

CasePilot doesn’t guess. It compares every document against every other and surfaces conflicts automatically, with citations on both sides.

PRIORITY 1

Sworn statement vs. documentary evidence

When a declaration claims one income figure but the W-2 or tax return shows another. The most consequential class of contradiction in family law.

Declaration: $4,000/mo · W-2 Box 1: $7,102/mo
PRIORITY 2

Self-contradiction across filings

When the same party has stated opposing things in different filings, depositions, or communications.

2024 motion: “I have no contact.” · 2024 email: “Spoke last Tuesday.”
PRIORITY 3

Third-party disagreement

When an independent record, bank statement, school form, or medical record, contradicts a party’s claim.

Claim: “Picked up from school.” · School log: absent that day.

Built from patterns I noticed in my own family-law case, then refined as I shaped CasePilot for everyone walking the same road. Assaf

WHO IT’S FOR

If you’re going through a contested family-law matter, the preparation work is yours either way.

You may have hired an attorney, or you may not have. Either way, the work of going through your own evidence, finding the moments that matter, reading documents you weren’t trained to read, building the chronology of what actually happened, is yours. No one can do it the way you can. No one else lived it.

CasePilot is for that work.

If you’re representing yourself, it’s the paralegal you can’t afford and the forensic accountant you don’t have access to. It gives you the preparation depth that parties with full legal teams take for granted.

If you have an attorney, it’s what you bring with you to your meetings. You walk in with the evidence already organized, already cited, already cross-referenced. Your attorney spends their time on argument and strategy, not on building a case file from your shoebox of paper. Your hours together go further.

Either way, it’s the system that makes the preparation phase reachable.

Custody and parenting time

Build a record of decision-making patterns, missed exchanges, and communication breakdowns, anchored to dates and source-cited. Cross-reference declarations against years of email and messages. Surface the moments that matter for your case.

Child support and financial disputes

Compare income declarations against W-2s, tax returns, and bank deposits. Surface every numeric inconsistency between sworn statements and documentary evidence. Pre-populate the Oregon Child Support Guidelines worksheet from documentary income, not from declared income.

Contested divorce

Pull together filings, communications, and financial records into one searchable archive. Generate cited declarations on demand. Build a timeline of asset and debt history with provenance attached at every step.

PRICING

One case, one price.

Twelve months of full access. Long enough to cover discovery, motion practice, and final orders. Most contested family-law matters take six to twelve months. This is priced for that arc.

Per-case access · Featured
$299one-time

Twelve months of full access. Long enough to cover discovery, motion practice, and final orders. Most contested family-law matters take six to twelve months. This is priced for that arc.

Buy per-case access
Compare all plans
Free$0/forever1 case, up to 5 documents, 10 AI questions per day. Watermarked exports.
Pro$39/month10 active cases, 5,000 documents, 50 GB. 300 AI questions and 100 drafts per day. Clean exports.
OREGON BETA · OPENING NOW

Join the first hundred.

We’re opening access slowly, in Oregon, so the first hundred users get a tool that actually works for them. If you’re in a contested family-law matter and the work above sounds like the work you’re already trying to do, drop your email. We’ll reach out when your spot is ready.

No sales calls. No spam.

By submitting, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.